1) Thanks a lot! That would be an logical improvement!
2) The nice part is that it is possible
I didn't get the idea, but I never tried working with UDF before. So, I think, I'll read about UDF and its possibilities and will understand how and when I can use it. And that fact that it will be possible in the future to get that information from an ISO/Joilet is also very interesting for me.
3) As I don't have to hurry anywhere and I work with StarBurn only as a hobby, it would be great if you give me possibility to understand how it works below the curtains of Verify(...) call.
You don't have to wonder about the reasons of this feature request and, when no one else will need it, you can even don't implement it at all. I asked for this only because it was strange for me that the single reading mistake aborts the verification process at all.
I was thinking this way: what if the user knows that disc is damaged, for example, in the beginning, but he wants to burn some data there? If the verification will never check after the first damaged block, user will never be able to find out is the other data written correctly!
I understand that the best way to use such discs is to throw them to the trash can, but still...
4) Thanks a lot, looks like I’ve got the idea.
Is there any information about CDB_FAILURE_INFORMATION values (different Sense and CDB values) somewhere in the StarBurn SDK documentation? Or is it something well-known and I have to search for it through the internet?
Thanks again for your rapid reply!