I didn't get that reply, but thank you none the less.
Also, I have a request, if it is possible without breaking everything. In the ole viewer, it doesn't make sense to me why the classes for starburn are all over the place in the class list in tree. They should all be grouped together...in my opinion...like every/most other application class/objects in the tree...so everything could be easily found and worked with/on. Maybe have a prefix in the class name, or even the full name of the dll. It would seem that the class name in the trees have nothing to do with the actual calling of the class so changing the "tree names" shouldn't affect anything, but I don't know much about that stuff...just a suggestion/request.
I await in anticipation.
Thanks.
|