#1 Burning Software

It is currently Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:57 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ExecuteCDB(): I/O device, re-executing the CDB, x vs. 5000
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 542
Hi,

one user reported that my application hangs at startup, but works fine in SPTD mode.
He sent an error log: http://forum.cdburnerxp.se/viewtopic.php?p=38976#p38976 that shows how StarBurn has 5000 attempts at executing an operation. Wouldn't it be suitable to reduce the attempts to at least prevent the impression of not being responding? I'd prefer an error message in that case, after a reasonable amount of retries (5000 does not seem reasonable).
I believe we have had a discussion about a similar issue earlier, but I can't find a reference to it currently.

Don't get me wrong, it's fine if SPTD is working when SPTI fails, but failure should be more obvious!

Thanks,
Florian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ExecuteCDB(): I/O device, re-executing the CDB, x vs. 5000
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 4:31 pm
Posts: 452
flöle wrote:
Hi,

one user reported that my application hangs at startup, but works fine in SPTD mode.
He sent an error log: http://forum.cdburnerxp.se/viewtopic.php?p=38976#p38976 that shows how StarBurn has 5000 attempts at executing an operation. Wouldn't it be suitable to reduce the attempts to at least prevent the impression of not being responding? I'd prefer an error message in that case, after a reasonable amount of retries (5000 does not seem reasonable).
I believe we have had a discussion about a similar issue earlier, but I can't find a reference to it currently.

Don't get me wrong, it's fine if SPTD is working when SPTI fails, but failure should be more obvious!

Thanks,
Florian


Look this thread:
http://www.starburnsoftware.com/forum/starburn-sdk-f3/application-freezing-when-using-starburnx-t2232.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ExecuteCDB(): I/O device, re-executing the CDB, x vs. 5000
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 542
Hm, I thought of another thread actually. But is it feasible to reduce the number of retries?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ExecuteCDB(): I/O device, re-executing the CDB, x vs. 5000
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
1) Yes, but it's not going to fix broken software co-existing with our component. We send command and never get response back. That's the problem.

2) We'll make command re-execution delay somehow changeable. That's doable and going to fix at least freeze issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group